headermask image

header image

SHURTLEFF TO FLDS, GIVE UP YOUR LAND, OR WE TAKE IT.

In a letter to Rod Parker, the Utah A.G. has demanded that the FLDS capitulate to the demands of cousin Brucie within 30 days, or they will lose their lands.

As a further extortion, he threatens to un incorporate the City if they do not give away their land.

The letter did not explain how either action “Protects” the Trust assets for the owners of the land (The FLDS), or what compensation they will receive for what amounts to a “Taking” of their property.

Mark was correct about one thing; this mess he created is going to be ligated for the next 20 years or more in the Federal Court’s. Last time I heard, the Government can’t take someone’s property no matter how much they don’t like the owners religious beliefs.

At minimum, the residents have Squatters Rights to their homes and land, and Federal Law backs them up.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

Money Making Options

Post meta

This entry was written by Bill and posted on February 3, 2010 at 7:34 pm and filed under Abuses of the State. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment(Latest is displayed first) or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Share with others

Post SHURTLEFF TO FLDS, GIVE UP YOUR LAND, OR WE TAKE IT. to digg. Post SHURTLEFF TO FLDS, GIVE UP YOUR LAND, OR WE TAKE IT. to Reddit add to stumbleupon Google Bookmark myweb bookmark on del.cio.us newsvine Tailrank magnolia Furl co.mments shadows simpy blinklist

15 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Why does the ranch in Texas look like The “Plat of the City of Zion”. that was made by Joseph Smith? Is the ranch really going to be called the
    ” Kingdom of Zion”. which means a land where god is to make the 2nd coming on the earth. or means god’s land. or gods people.

    1. TOM on February 8th, 2010 at 8:55 pm

  2. all these attacks are coming from the lds that control the state of utah. they are scared of the yfz ranch being called the “kingdom of zion”

    2. TOM on February 8th, 2010 at 8:48 pm

  3. The AG is not going to weaken the flds. he is making them stronger. AG is teaching the females and children the truth about the u.s. government. the flds can chage, but not by force of stealing land.

    3. TOM on February 8th, 2010 at 8:43 pm

  4. do what they did in ” little house on the prairie” there city was taken from them by force. so they burned and blow up the whole city and buildings. You can ether watch the state of utah steal your land and sell it or blow it up. I say blow it up and make it worthless for the state to own. I would even have the media there to watch thing being blown up. Too show what there media reports, have forced the flds to do.

    4. TOM on February 8th, 2010 at 8:39 pm

  5. Ok ,,,,,,sit there.

    5. zxc on February 4th, 2010 at 3:23 pm

  6. FLDS should place a law suit against all of texas people in the raid and pay the back cost of the other land owned by FLDS. 250 MILLION sounds good.

    6. TOM on February 4th, 2010 at 1:24 pm

  7. Moving to Texas would make about as much sense as waving goodbye to the children would have been. Taking something that isint yours is stealing. Right?

    7. mag on February 4th, 2010 at 1:16 pm

  8. “I’ve said it more than once and will say it again…..MOVE TO TEXAS”

    LMAO.. no way, never!!!

    8. Sazzie on February 4th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

  9. “Empty threat. Shurtleff doesn’t have the authority to dis-incorporate a town. That power lies with the courts or possibly the state legislature.”

    —
    But he says he will go to the legislature, and presumably they will make a law just for the FLDS. That seems to be legal nowadays. But he apparently has forgotten that he and the FLDS already came to an agreement, which Wisan derided and the judge refused.

    9. Julie on February 4th, 2010 at 12:38 pm

  10. Empty threat. Shurtleff doesn’t have the authority to dis-incorporate a town. That power lies with the courts or possibly the state legislature.

    10. Alinusara10 on February 4th, 2010 at 12:05 pm

  11. I’ve said it more than once and will say it again…..MOVE TO TEXAS. The ranch is paid for and a few thousand more registered voters in Schleicher county would be a breath of fresh air in the State.

    The church could rent property for $1 a year to its members and avoid any attempt at a repeat of land siezure in Texas based on “communal” property.

    Need to think “outside the box” to beat the land thieves.

    11. zxc on February 4th, 2010 at 8:48 am

  12. This is similar to the Missouri extermination order, except that Shurtleff intends to exterminate a city instead of its people. Ironic, isn’t it, that a Mormon who tries to appear sensitive to civil rights, who has even written a book about Dred Scott, would recapitulate the persecution of the early Mormons.

    12. Julie on February 4th, 2010 at 8:37 am

  13. What would stop them from reincorporating?
    According to BAdams in her latest SLT article, disincorporating requires a petition by 25% of the residents and a majority vote. Fat chance the FLDS residents are going to vote “aye” on dissolution.
    So what new law does Shirtleff propose? How about this: “If the population of a community where more than 50% of the residents religious belief is Fundie Mormonism along with clothing themselves in blue jeans, dress shirts, and prairie skirts, such a community shall forever be prohibited from incorporating as a town or city”.
    I don’t think a law like this can pass muster in the courts.

    13. duaneh on February 4th, 2010 at 1:41 am

  14. What some sweet a$$$9, retards!

    14. dazzle on February 4th, 2010 at 12:19 am

  15. Well, if that’s what they’re saying, then at least they’re finally being honest for a change. That’s refreshing

    15. Xorph on February 3rd, 2010 at 8:56 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*