headermask image

header image

THIS IS FOR THE “IT’S THE LAW!” CROWD

The next time a good old boy smirks from his barstool at a conviction, hand him this piece of legal dreck. (Shit, for our non Jewish friends). Keep in mind, the 25 people out of 26 convicted had an “Impartial” judge and a “Jury of their peers”.

Like Abbott and barbie, if they had given the Ranch all the exculpatory evidence they know about and are with holding, both Raymond and Allan would not now stand “Convicted” of any thing. But that will have to wait for Raymond’s Appeal as Abbott knows all too well.

Print|Email

Kern County’s Monstrous D.A.

Farewell to Ed Jagels, a man who put 25 innocent “child abusers” in prison.

In October, Jagels told the Bakersfield Californian that after 26 years in office, he won’t be running for reelection in 2010. Good riddance to him. You’d be hard pressed to find a law enforcement official anywhere in the country who better embodies the worst excesses of America’s sharp turn toward law-and-order crime policy over last 30 years. From expanding the death penalty to eroding the rights of the accused to jacking up prison populations to formulating crime policy around sports metaphors, Jagels created a high-profile position by backing just about every bad crime policy in a generation.

But if history dispenses justice more honorably than Ed Jagels ever did, the boyish-looking D.A. will be most remembered for his role ruining countless lives in perhaps the most shameful of the Reagan-era “tough on crime” debacles: the coast-to-coast sex abuse panic of the 1980s.

Jagels began his career as an assistant district attorney in Kern County, then took over his boss’s position in 1982 after winning a controversial election against state Superior Court Judge Marvin Ferguson. The election swung in Jagels’ direction during a debate with Ferguson, when an anti-crime activist revealed the contents of a confidential file in the judge’s ruling on a child custody case which led to the girl being killed by her stepfather. According to a subsequent grand jury report, the file was illegally lifted from the county courthouse by Colleen Ryan, one of Jagels’ fellow assistant D.A.s. Jagels had run on a vigorous anti-crime platform, and wasted no time clearing the D.A.’s office’s old guard, re-staffing it with younger prosecutors more in line with his philosophy. Needless to say, he never investigated Ryan for stealing the court file. She went on to become a judge.

At about the same time Jagels took office, Bakersfield (the Kern County seat) was in the midst of a strange scandal. Rumors had circulated for years that older, well-connected men among Bakersfield’s political, law enforcement, and business elite were involved in sex rings with underage teen boys. The “Lords of Bakersfield” rumors gained traction after several young gay men in the community were murdered in the early 1980s, and the accused were given relatively light sentences. Jagels did make sex crimes a priority during his first years in office, but he had little interest in the Lords of Bakersfield. Indeed, the notoriously tough on crime prosecutor took a pass, going easy when the alleged boyfriend of one of his assistant D.A.s kept getting arrested on drug charges. Jagels’ subordinate was later murdered by the young man’s father.

Instead, Jagels set his sights on Kern County’s lower middle class. Relying on suggestive police and social worker interrogations of children, Jagels’ office put 26 people behind bars on felony child sex abuse charges in the 1980s and ‘90s. Of those 26 convictions, 25 have since been overturned.

The details were lurid, and bore striking similarity to the fantastical stories that were springing from similar cases all over the country, from Florida to Massachusetts to Washington State. Parents were accused of having sex with their own children, of forcing young siblings to have sex with each other, of inviting neighbors over for adult-child orgies. When the national panic began to include stories of cult activity and Satan worship, Jagels’ and the Kern County Sheriff’s Department managed to locate that sordid activity in Bakersfield, too. Now children began telling investigators they had been forced to drink blood; they were hung from ceilings naked and beaten; infants were sodomized, murdered, and cannibalized. There was never any physical evidence to back the accusations. The photos the children alleged the accused to have taken during the acts never surfaced. The bodies of the murdered babies were never found. In one case a child alleged to have been murdered was found alive and healthy, living with her parents. (Gee, does any of this sound vaguely familiar?)

Many of Jagels’ victims are profiled in the moving 2008 documentary Witch Hunt. They aren’t limited to the people he put in prison. Particularly wrenching are the interviews with children who made the false accusations. They’re now adults, and have carried unfathomable guilt and remorse. Some of these children put their parents in prison for a decade or more. In one scene, a man who falsely accused his neighbor of molesting him as a child breaks down in tears as he explains how due to fear and guilt, he’s never been able to bathe his own son.

But when some of these child accusers came forward as adults to recant their testimony and demand the release of the people they helped wrongly put in prison, Jagels and his deputies called them liars in court.

Witch Hunt includes footage of Jagels stating with isn’t-it-obvious mockery that children simply don’t lie about these sorts of things. Except that they do, especially when they’re led and guilted into lying by adult authority figures. Jagels’ victim Jeff Modahl was released in 1999 after serving 15 years for molesting his own daughters. One piece of evidence key to his release was an audio tape that surfaced in the late 1990s of a police interview with one of the girls. In it, the interviewers clearly lead the girl, drop in suggestions, and repeat questions until they get affirmative answers. Modahl’s lawyers also found a medical exam performed on Modahl’s daughter showing none of the physical evidence that should have been present if the allegations had been true. Neither the report nor the tape were turned over to Modahl’s lawyers for his trial. His daughter has since recanted her testimony and helped win her father’s release. She says in the movie that she’s battled addiction problems her entire life to bury the guilt she feels for putting him in prison.

In 1986, a grand jury released a blistering report on the sex abuse prosecutions, accusing Kern County officials of fostering a “presumption of guilt” and bringing charges on little more than hunches. California Attorney General John Van de Kamp released a report in September of the same year reaching the same conclusions. But no Kern County official was ever fired or disciplined, and the prosecutions continued. Jagels continued to get elected. So far, Kern County has paid out more than $9 million in wrongful conviction settlements.

In his 1999 book Mean Justice, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Edward Humes noted that by Jagels’ second term, the D.A. had tripled the number of prosecutorial misconduct complaints of his predecessor. He was regularly berated by appellate courts for withholding exculpatory evidence and for his courtroom behavior, admonishments Jagels seemed to relish. Bakersfield had gone from a blue-collar town of farmers and oil workers to the poster city for the lock ‘em up movement. Residents touted the city’s mock slogan: “Come for vacation, leave on probation.”

Jagels’ influence has leaked across county borders. Over the course of his career he has been a leading voice in formulating and pushing the policies that have overpopulated California’s prisons. He boasts that he’s pursued the state’s controversial “three strikes and you’re out” policy more aggressively than any prosecutor in the state, though as one anti-three strikes activist group points out, since the law was implemented Kern County’s crime rate has dropped at a significantly slower rate than jurisdictions such as San Francisco County, where three strikes isn’t enforced. Jagels was also at the fore of 1990’s Proposition 115, which made significant pro-prosecution changes to pre-trial hearings and the discovery process. More recently, Jagels weighed in on the medical marijuana debate, recommending that all dispensaries in Kern County be prohibited. He also led the effort to get three anti-death penalty justices removed from the California Supreme Court, an ironic twist, given that Ed Jagels and his 25 false convictions is a walking argument against the death penalty.

Perhaps the most troubling thing about Ed Jagels’ career is that not only have the legal and political systems in California never sanctioned him for his monstrous behavior, he’s been regularly rewarded for it. He has served as both president and director of the powerful California District Attorneys Association (CDAA), and on a number of blue ribbon panels charged with advising state officials on crime policy. Upon Jagels’ retirement announcement, Scott Thorpe, the current head of the CDAA, told the Associated Press that Jagels is a “prosecutor’s prosecutor,” a remarkable and revealing statement of that organization’s commitment to justice. Jagels is also listed as a crime policy advisor to Meg Whitman, a leading candidate for the California GOP’s 2010 gubernatorial nomination.

Given his history, the obituary for Jagels’ career ought to describe a rogue, renegade prosecutor long ago shunted to the fringe by colleagues embarrassed by his continuing reelection. Instead, as a former subordinate recently told the Bakersfield Californian, “Prosecutors from around the state seek and respect his advice on almost every issue of public safety.” (CA has Jagel’s, TX has barbie)

And that’s the problem. Bad actors like Jagels aren’t shunned. They’re venerated. Peers seek their counsel. And the same justice system so eager to mete out accountability to the accused continues to fail to hold accountable the people we entrust to run it.

Radley Balko is a senior editor at Reason magazine.

So, ask me again why I don’t respect “The Law” !

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

28 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Apparently, there was enough truth to stop the investigations.

    I’m sure the interrogator who was coaching the children
    got re-assigned to a crossing guards position or somewhere else where she could do no more harm to
    her fellow officers.

    1. Bill on December 25th, 2009 at 6:18 am
  2. BTW the McMartin cases followed Jagels’ example: the Bakersfield cases went forward first. [when I first heard about them I thought maybe they occurred in a rural area not heavily populated Bakersfield.] I think the only one who wasn’t overturned was Grant Self, who had previously been convicted of a similar crime. He was in a mental hospital according to the last reports I saw.

    Six similar cases occurred quickly throughout Kern county. They were stopped when children began to accuse police officers and social workers of being members of sex rings.

    Interesting how that happened. I wonder if there was any truth to those reports?

    2. JMR on December 25th, 2009 at 5:36 am
  3. That tell’s me that he owned a piece of the place.

    3. Bill on December 25th, 2009 at 4:51 am
  4. I once had a Texan (Hope4Kidz) tell me judges in Texas were “hard arsed”, I about told her that until she lived in Kern Co. she had no idea what that meant. Jagels hasn’t followed the law. I think there a couple of abortion clinics in Bakersfield he could shut down for child abuse reporting (actually failure to report). He has never investigated them. BTW shutting them would have garnered him higher local vote counts.

    4. JMR on December 25th, 2009 at 4:17 am
  5. When I moved in Texas in 1997, the state had an election. One bill was to overturn the state law that prohibiting home owners from borrowing against their home’s equity unless the home was 75% paid off. (I may be wrong about the percentage, but I’m sure you will get the idea.) One of the ads in favor of overturning the law featured a drawing of Texas policeman shaking his finger at the audience. Does anyone remember that?

    5. Cupcake on December 24th, 2009 at 10:24 pm
  6. Yep Cupcake………..the Spanish system is more prevalent in civil cases but the criminal system has been skewed as well. It is the system that the Feds try on occasion to bend to fit the English common law model.
    The State of Texas and Florida are throwbacks to the time of the inquisition and property law is another example of an antiquated way of thinking. There are protections for the property owners here that exist in few other states…………just ask a banker about Texas law. They hate it.

    This isn’t about the US constitution or freedom of religion, It is about the power of the State and the power of the Individuals that run the State. County Sheriffs guard the gates of a very special club. The last thing the power structure wants here is a group of “outsiders” to upset the apple cart.

    If ya don’t fit…they won’t aquit. They just taylor laws to dispose of the oddballs…………same ole story as before just a different century.

    6. zxc on December 24th, 2009 at 10:22 am
  7. I think the comment about Texas judicial system being based on Spanish civil and criminal law is interesting. It explains why Texas is addicted to convictions.

    7. Cupcake on December 24th, 2009 at 1:05 am
  8. The Texas judicial system IS antiquated and it is by design. The civil system and criminal system was based on Spanish civil and criminal law. The Spanish system presumes Guilt and the defendant proves innocence.

    Look at Mexico as an example of Spanish injustice……….look at Fla. and Texas as our own examples of Spanish law.

    You mentioned the DA in Dallas as the only DA to admit that something is askew. The DA is not part of the good ole boy system. The man is African American and not part of the WASP power structure.

    The judicial system in Texas is a leftover from the patron system and the people are the peons…………..

    I am from Texas and have been on both sides of the legal fence in my lifetime. The same culture that allows the miscarraige of justice is quite happy to ELECT persons to office that are first and foremost part of their crowd……….. hang em high as long as they are Catholic, FLDS, or any other no-fundamentalist congregation.

    I was so suprised by the TX Supreme Courts ruleing in favor of the children. I was floored. But then again the law and order crowd and the literal interpretation following could not get past the letter of the Texas law…………

    If you disagree with the locals the first question that you are asked is “where are you from” then it degenerats into where did you go to school. For a real nullification of your ideas there is always the …………what church do you belong to or the ever popular “are you born again” question.

    Don’t think that I don’t love my State …….. but I recognize that if we weren’t part of the US we would be a third world judicial cesspool.

    8. zxc on December 23rd, 2009 at 8:55 pm
  9. I think the problem is that Texas’ judicial system hasn’t evolved much since horse and buggy days.

    For example, many European countries consider the death penalty to be barbaric and medieval. The large number of inmates Texas executes each year is an embarrassment to the rest of the country. It suggests that the United States is not as civilized as we claim.

    In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court had to tell Texans that they could no longer execute the mentally retarded or juvenile offenders who were under 18 when they committed crimes.

    9. Cupcake on December 23rd, 2009 at 8:31 pm
  10. I don’t disagree with you one bit, but what I don’t understand is why Texas would deliberately go out of it’s way to make themselves out to be the most corrupt, bigoted, and ignorant State in the Union.

    No State in the Union has a higher rate of over-turned convictions, and yet only one D.A. in the entire State (Dallas) has ever said “We blew it, we were wrong.”

    The whole world knows they fried Willingham for murdering his two girls when he was actually innocent, and yet the hairball wants to pretend the guy ain’t really dead by his own hands.

    These people are not human, they are ghouls, parasites and vermin in any normal society.

    If Mexico invaded Texas today and I was there with a gun, I’d hop on a plane and give the place to the Mexican’s with my blessings.

    10. Bill on December 23rd, 2009 at 2:39 pm
  11. Everyone speaks of the “mistakes” made by the various State agencies and lawmakers in this affair as if the lawyers are idiots stumbling thru the law and makeing mistakes that will be overturned on appeal.

    It is my belief that more than a simple majority of the governments “servants” are well aware of their “mistakes” and they continue to dig their appealable hole intentionaly.

    Most of the legislators and all of the governments lawyers have been to law school and know the constitution ..at least they passed the bar exam.

    Every step in the process and ultimate conviction of the FLDS men costs money and this kangeroo court has its own “bleed the beast” agenda. The State won’t flinch because it has the deepest pockets and the illegality of the governments actions may never be tested in a higher court due to the lack of funds of the FLDS.

    There is “legal” in this country if you can pay for it and every lawyer in the country will tell you that in a heartbeat.

    11. zxc on December 23rd, 2009 at 2:21 pm
  12. Neither did anyone on the Ranch

    12. Bill on December 23rd, 2009 at 12:58 pm
  13. Bill,

    I developed the analogy that cops were like bees when I was in my teens. Ignore them and they will leave you alone. Swat them and they’ll sting you. I know it sounds silly, but it’s always worked for me. I have never been arrested for anything in my life.

    13. Cupcake on December 23rd, 2009 at 12:45 pm
  14. Maybe the Texas Rangers are not aware of this?

    Hair Tests Yield More Positive Results for Drug Use than Urine Tests
    December 1, 2009

    Drug tests that use hair samples turn up positive for cocaine and methamphetamine far more frequently than urine-based drug tests, USA Today reported Nov. 20.

    Cocaine, for example, was detected in three out of every 1,000 urine tests that job applicants and employees took during the first part of 2009, but was found in 32 of every 1,000 hair tests — more than 10 times more frequently — according to Quest Diagnostics, a drug-testing firm.

    Methamphetamine was detected in nine times more hair tests than urine tests, the company added.

    14. Bill on December 23rd, 2009 at 11:11 am
  15. As a child, I was told that the “Policeman was your friend”. I learned otherwise.

    Whatever happened to “To protect and to serve”?

    Why in the world would anyone equate cops with a bee’s nest?

    Does that not, in and of itself, prove my point?

    People know that to come into contact with a cop is a very dangerous thing to do. I wonder how they came to that conclusion…NOT!

    15. Bill on December 23rd, 2009 at 10:43 am
  16. People need to grow up and learn: if a story sounds like it’s coming from a child molesters dream, it probably is.

    Example; as any cop out there can tell you, someone taking drugs can be identied by their hair because the drugs can be detected MONTH”S after the taking in a lab.

    If the kids were given “Silly pills”, then take a lock of hair and identify the drug and prosecute based on real evidence.

    The cops DID that in Mineola. The problem was, there were no drugs found, so that part of the “Investigation” was “Forgotten” by the prosecution. In legal terms, that’s what’s known as “Withholding exculpatory evidence”.

    There has been no new trial yet because Abbott is trying to find a way to save Kemp’s ass from being impeached. I would not impeach the prick, I’d throw his ass in prison for perjury.

    Something like the Mohler case isn’t going to stop until the public stops drooling over these kiddie porn stories they are so addicted to.

    Want to read kiddie porn? Pick up your local newspaper.

    16. Bill on December 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 am
  17. Re: Cops

    As I said earlier, I’ve had very little contact with police officers. But I would like to share with you a story my dad told me.

    When my dad was a teen in Cleveland, he got caught smoking a cigarette by a police officer. Regular tobacco — not marijuana. Anyway, this big, tall, mean police officer demanded that my father put it out and eat it. My dad was afraid of cops, so he did. Dad said the tobacco made him really sick.

    But the cop’s lesson didn’t stop my dad from smoking two packs of cigarettes a day until he died at age 65.

    I think police officers are like bees. Just leave them alone and let them go about their business. If you ignore them, they won’t bother you. But if you swat at one, you’ll get stung.

    17. Cupcake on December 23rd, 2009 at 2:18 am
  18. Re: Cops

    My motto is there are good and bad in every race, religion and ethnic group. I suppose I shoud extend that to include occupations too.

    Truthfully, I’ve had very little to do with cops in life. I generally avoid them.

    Most of the Washingtonians I know are concerned about the children of the police officers who died. Nine children lost a parent as a result of the shooting at the coffee shop. There is a rumor going around the families of the police officers who died will not get to collect life insurance or monies from the state because the officers had not clocked before they were murdered.

    18. Cupcake on December 23rd, 2009 at 1:59 am
  19. The blogger at “Fall of Reynolds” sums up the hate campaing against the FLDS quite nicely.

    1. Recently, Judge Lintbag denied an FLDS motion in the UEP trust case. Maybe that is to be expected but, to “twist the knife”, she ACTUALLY announced that she was “striking” the motion from the court record. (I think Lintbag and Wart-thug must be lovers). She needs to learn to spell the word, “A-P-P-E-A-L”.

    2. Becky Musser has become the darling “STAR” witness for the prosecution in the FLDS trials. We conveniently overlook the fact that she (like Intestinal Flora and the other unmentionables) were intimately embroiled in the conspiracy to choreograph the YFZ Ranch raid. More odorous still is the fact that a Texas deputy A.G. flew to Boise (among other places) to accompany Musser for depositions, in order to run interference and protect her at all costs from exposure as a conspiratrice.

    3. Texas’s Attorney General, Greg Abbott, was permitted by Barbie to campaign to prospective jurors last week (during voir dire) regarding the importance of delivering a “stiff” sentence to the FLDS men. That smells to me like abuse of process, but who am I to have an opinion about justice in America? Oh yeah, that’s right - it’s not ABOUT JUSTICE - it’s about politics and PAYCHECKS !!!!

    4. Harvey Hilderbran (who has made no secret of his determination to drive the FLDS out of Texas) managed to craft an unbelievably unconstitutional sentencing enhancement into recent legislation. After the FLDS moved into Eldorado, the law was changed - NOT ONLY to provide stiff sentences for young, unlicensed marriages, but ALSO to add an extra 79-year sentencing enhancement if there is a “religious” component to the non-legal “marriage”. Tell me this isn’t a direct targeting of the FLDS community (and EX POST FACTO legislation). Hilderbran needs to read the Lukumi decision

    http://fallofreynolds.blogspot.com/

    19. duaneh on December 22nd, 2009 at 11:38 pm
  20. Here is an update on the Moehler case. It seems since the prosecution has no dead bodies, the “Mohler 5″ are being charged only with “crimes” that don’t require real evidence…mainly sex abuse charges based on “repressed memories”

    Is Lafayette County cherry-picking accusations in Mohler case?
    http://www.examiner.com/x-8922-Portland-Skepticism-Examiner~y2009m12d18-Is-Lafayette-County-cherrypicking-accusations-in-Mohler-case

    Here is some good news. A judge completely trashed the Broadcom fraud case because of witness intimidation by the prosecutors.
    http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/12/21/14641/580

    some notable excerpts from the decision:

    TO SUBMIT THIS CASE TO THE JURY WOULD MAKE A MOCKERY OF MR. RUEHLE’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL…THE GOVERNMENT MUST NOT DO ANYTHING TO INTIMIDATE OR IMPROPERLY INFLUENCE WITNESSES. SADLY, GOVERNMENT DID SO IN THIS CASE…NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE GOVERNMENT’S TREATMENT OF DR. SAMUELI WAS SHAMEFUL AND CONTRARY TO AMERICAN VALUES OF DECENCY AND JUSTICE

    Finally, he makes one of the best quotes I’ve ever heard from a judge

    I HAVE A SOLEMN OBLIGATION TO HOLD THE GOVERNMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION. I’M DOING NOTHING MORE AND NOTHING LESS. AND I ASK MY CRITICS TO PUT THEMSELVES IN THE SHOES OF THE ACCUSED.

    YOU ARE CHARGED WITH SERIOUS CRIMES AND, IF CONVICTED ON THEM, YOU WILL SPEND THE REST OF YOUR LIFE IN PRISON. YOU ONLY HAVE THREE WITNESSES TO PROVE YOUR INNOCENCE AND GOVERNMENT HAS INTIMIDATED AND IMPROPERLY INFLUENCED EACH ONE OF THEM. IS THAT FAIR? IS THAT JUSTICE? I SAY ABSOLUTELY NOT.

    Why are Jurists such as Judge Carmey so few and far between??

    20. duaneh on December 22nd, 2009 at 11:26 pm
  21. Don’t forget the DA in the Duke case or the McMartin Case in LA.

    21. Bob on December 22nd, 2009 at 9:24 pm
  22. You can bet the farm that if they let him out after going through the expense of dragging him up there, that the case is falling apart, especially for his “Involvement”

    Just like the Kemp Mineola Fantasy, I’ve been trying to get one of those loud mouth C.S’s to put their money where their mouth is, but they won’t bite.

    There is a silver lining to all of this; there are now at least 6 more American families who know that the witchhunt is still running at full steam.

    Can anyone out there name ONE of these sensational “Sex club” cases that ended up being true?

    22. Bill on December 22nd, 2009 at 7:04 pm
  23. As for the Mohlers, the elder brother from Florida had his bond reduced from cash only, which means he can get out by paying $4k. I’ve never heard of a case where a state extradites a suspect and then lets him out like that. Especially with all the claims that should make it Missouri’s crime of the century…if they weren’t imaginary, that is.

    23. Julie on December 22nd, 2009 at 6:32 pm
  24. Cupcake,

    Different people have different experiences with “The law”.

    I am happy that you have a positive feeling towards the cops, but I do not.

    At age 12, a Nassua County (NY) cop digitally raped me. He said he was “Looking for money”, but I really didn’t believe him. It happened at a Levittown, (L.I.)
    pool. (Sunrise Lane)

    At age 13, me and another boy were taken out of school and beaten for 3 hours in the Huntington, (L.I.) Police Departments Detective Unit. They were convinced we had burgled a Donut Shop in town. I only know the name of one of the Detectives, it was Roy K. Davis, Jr.

    40 years later, Roy and I laughed about the beatings, mainly because my friend and I knew who actually did burgle the shop, but it wasn’t us and we just watched as we were beaten and the cops played “Good cop, bad cop” with us while we got our faces beaten in.

    There are good reasons why I detest CPS, and even more reasons why I detest cops. Maybe getting raped and beaten as a “Child” had something to do with it.

    As for Washington States current fad, I find it curious that we are not hearing of a gaggle of Firemen, Post Office workers, Janitors or car salesmen getting knocked off.

    As the goons are very quick to tell you; “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” So just maybe the locals know that if the have contact with your cops, they will likely die, so they are taking a little preventive action.

    Take another look at the pictures of the goons on the Ranch. Do they look like the friendly local policeman to you or do they look like they are ready to go to war?

    MOST cops have an “Us against them” attitude. The “Them” is the much hated “Civilian”. A civilian to them is anybody not a cop.

    24. Bill on December 22nd, 2009 at 2:34 pm
  25. Now, Bill, I realize you just stated that you don’t respect the law. But I hope you will bear with me for a moment.

    Last night, Washington State suffered another tragedy. Two more of our police officers were shot. They were responding to a domestic violence call when a man opened fire on them. One is in critical condition at a hospital. The other is in serious condition at a different hospital. The shooter is dead.

    Since Halloween, seven police officers in Washington State have been shot. The officer shot on Halloween night died. Last month, four police officers were murdered at a coffee shop. Two more last night. Some Washingtonians have come to believe shooting police officers has become a game here. This “game” is both frightening and heartbreaking.

    While I don’t approve of the Texas Rangers pretending to be looking for an abused child when they really wanted to raid the FLDS temple, I don’t hate police officers. I believe that most police officers are honest, decent people who are just doing their job.

    So I humbly ask for prayers that the two police officers who were shot last night will recover and that the shootings of police officers in Washington State will stop. Thank you.

    25. Cupcake on December 22nd, 2009 at 2:01 pm
  26. Re: Mohler case

    The crimes the Mohlers allegedly committed occurred during the 80’s and 90’s — about the McMartin Preschool case was going on.

    Do you think it is possible that the Mohler girls and their mother were influenced by the panic (of child molestation and satanic sex rituals) caused by the McMartin case?

    26. Cupcake on December 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 pm
  27. It’s a carbon copy of Philip Kemp’s fantasy, “The Mineola Sex Club Caper”.

    Let’s not forget; the “Reason” for going into the Ranch was the abuse of “Sarah”.

    The reason for going into the Tony Alamo Ministries was because the goons “Knew” the children were being used to make porno.

    No “Sarah”, no “Porno”, no dead babies, no baby’s buried on the Ranch, no “Crematorium” on the Ranch,
    no evidence of physical sexual abuse.

    Nothing but CPS, CASA, Judges and Prosecutors who make charges and can’t back them up with evidence.

    Do 14 to 18 year old “Children” in Eldorado and San Angelo agree to have sex? Poll the local High Schools.

    27. Bill on December 22nd, 2009 at 12:11 pm
  28. “There was never any physical evidence to back the accusations. The photos the children alleged the accused to have taken during the acts never surfaced. The bodies of the murdered babies were never found.”

    Sounds just like the Mohler case.

    28. Julie on December 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*