headermask image

header image

TEXAS ANTI MORMON LAW GOES TO APPEAL.

The conviction for Raymond Jessop is already being Appealed on many grounds including using the “Evidence” stolen from the Ranch under the phoney pretext of a child abuse “Investigation”, and now with the conviction of Allan Keate on the State’s trumped up charges, Hilderbrands bit of bigotry against Mormons will now be Constitutionally tested for the first time.

Since it’s inception, the “Law” that was tailored exclusively to the States Mormon men has never been tested, nor has it even been charged against anyone before, since the State had no Mormon it had Indicted for sex crimes amongst it’s “Children”.

It’s not that Texas had no problem with adult men having sex with Texas Children, they have been having sex with them since before the State even existed. These are the stats which demonstrates the prefer-ability of Texas’s school children by Texas adults:

Cost and Outcomes

The Costs. . .
Medicaid paid for 173,226 deliveries in Texas, at an estimated total cost of $420 million (HMO deliveries are estimated). Approximately 10% of these deliveries were to teen mothers aged-13-17, at a cost of $41 million.

How Often Does a Teenager in Texas Get Pregnant?

  • Every 10 minutes, a teen in Texas gets pregnant.
  • Every 10 hours, a 14-year-old teen gets pregnant.
  • Every 3 hours, a 15-year-old teen gets pregnant.
  • Every 1.5 hours, a 16-year-old teen gets pregnant.
  • Every 52 minutes, a 17-year-old-teen gets pregnant.
  • Every 35 minutes, an 18-year-old teen gets pregnant.
  • Every 28 minutes, a 19-year-old teen gets pregnant.

What are the Outcomes?

  • Every 10 minutes a teen gives birth.
  • Every 48 minutes a teen has an abortion.

Up until Hilderbrand found his publically stated “Excuse” to get his fat feet on the Ranch on April 3, 2008 the State of Texas had no Mormons to prosecute. Now of course, they have 12 Mormons to persecute, and the first to be tried under the new Mormon Law was Allan Keate who was sentenced to 33 years in prison for being a Mormon.

If Texas gets away with this little bit of hatred against a religion, maybe we can start going after all the rest of them we hate so much. Where to start? The Jews?, The Catholics?, the Muslims?, the Methodist’s?. How about them super sneaky Baptists who gave birth to most of them babies we had by Texas “Children”?

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

Money Making Options

Post meta

This entry was written by Bill and posted on December 19, 2009 at 12:21 pm and filed under Abuses of the State, CPS, CPS Abuse, Children, Constitutional Rights, Due Process, FLDS, Police State, Texas, Texas Rangers. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment(Latest is displayed first) or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Share with others

Post TEXAS ANTI MORMON LAW GOES TO APPEAL. to digg. Post TEXAS ANTI MORMON LAW GOES TO APPEAL. to Reddit add to stumbleupon Google Bookmark myweb bookmark on del.cio.us newsvine Tailrank magnolia Furl co.mments shadows simpy blinklist

8 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. “I was thinking they may wait until that February hearing before Judge Conn before they file the 1st appeal since he will look at the admissibility of the evidence in a more neutral environment and give rulings though not directly admissible certainly will bring up the issues at stake.”

    The advantage there is what all Conn will allow in the process (discovery, depositions…). I do not see a great need for delay in filing the appeal that results from the case in Conn’s court. If an issue was not preserved for appeal in Raymond’s case, it is not of value in the appeal, with exception for any not properly shared in the process.

    1. kbp on December 20th, 2009 at 1:49 am

  2. What’s the rate for a 29 year old in Texas getting pregnant! Lol

    2. pins on December 19th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

  3. Better get the appeal show on the road soon. The appeal process is long but it might save the other ten men some time in jail.

    3. zxc on December 19th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

  4. I hope their 4th amendment arguments include what they said in the WJ case: “the dumber, lazier, less curious and more close-minded the [Texas] law enforcement officer, the greater likelihood of subsequent judicial approval over his or her inept and tainted investigation.”

    4. Julie on December 19th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

  5. We spoke about an hour ago. They don’t want to make the Appeal language public right now, but as soon as it’s about to be filed, I will share it with you.

    5. Bill on December 19th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

  6. Thanks Bill.

    I was thinking they may wait until that February hearing before Judge Conn before they file the 1st appeal since he will look at the admissibility of the evidence in a more neutral environment and give rulings though not directly admissible certainly will bring up the issues at stake. I remember Piccarrete was stating that the state not the defendant has the burden of proof showing the evidence was gained lawfully.

    6. Alinusara10 on December 19th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

  7. I will see if I can’t get a copy.

    7. Bill on December 19th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

  8. Malonis and her ilk have published everything else, so has anyone published the appeal?

    8. Julie on December 19th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*