headermask image

header image

AND THE RELEVANCE TO ALLEN KEATE IS WHAT?

If Allan Keate’s mother fed him peanut butter and jelly sandwiches in 3rd Grade, I’m sure we’re going to be seeing them entered into the trail by barbie.

“Relevance” according to barbie appears to have been anybody or anything who ever read about, or heard about the FLDS, so long as it was in a negative light.

If there was ever a case of a Judge who’s intent was to Inflame the Jury and prejudice them against the defendant (Even though it’s not necessary in this particular case), it’s her rulings to throw everything at the FLDS men she can including the placenta.

The FLDS is determined not to open any doors to the prosecution and is content with allowing the Appeal of Raymond’s conviction to free all the men without giving the Appeals Court’s any excuse to allow the stolen evidence. However, I strongly suggest that they put Marilyn and all the girls on the stand to simply state to the Jury what they already know; There are no victims in this case and there were no sexual assaults. Beyond that, say nothing and if barbie wants to throw the “Child” in jail for contempt of Court, let the public decide if barbie is more interested in persecuting the man or protecting the child as she claims.

Lastly, the Indictments are claiming that Allan, and all the men for that matter acted “Against the Peace and Dignity of the State.” How can you break something that never existed? Texas leads the Country in teen pregnancies, and the WORLD in throwing people in prison.

Another name for Texas could easily be “Sodom and Gomorrah”. San Angelo has it’s own Chapter of the Klan, the LARGEST Klaxon in the COUNTRY. By comparison to their neighbors, the Ranch residents are SAINTS!

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

Money Making Options

Post meta

This entry was written by Bill and posted on December 16, 2009 at 3:30 pm and filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment(Latest is displayed first) or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Share with others

Post AND THE RELEVANCE TO ALLEN KEATE IS WHAT? to digg. Post AND THE RELEVANCE TO ALLEN KEATE IS WHAT? to Reddit add to stumbleupon Google Bookmark myweb bookmark on del.cio.us newsvine Tailrank magnolia Furl co.mments shadows simpy blinklist

16 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. It infuriates his “Boys” but J. Edgar Hoover was a flaming cross dresser.

    His “Boys” of course deny it, but you just can’t walk around washington in a dress with your boy friend and not have people notice.

    Google “J. Edgar Hoover” and read what MSM will NEVER print out of the stark terror of what the Government will do to them.

    They hate to interview me because they know why I have that Cheshire Cat smile on my face. It’s tough to fear someone when you know that behind the facade is a guy in a tutu.

    1. Bill on December 17th, 2009 at 10:58 am

  2. Bill,

    Which one is J. Edgar Homo?

    2. WC on December 17th, 2009 at 10:13 am

  3. According to CPS and CASA, the little boys on the Ranch needed to be taken away because they were “Future pedophiles”.

    Well, then I guess the teens involved in all the San Angelo and Eldorado fat bellies were taught by their family’s and should be taken away for their “Belief system”.

    There were 100 girls, some in the 7th grade (12 years old), in the San Angelo School District in 2006-2007.

    There were 117 girls, some in the 6th grade (11 years old), in the 2007-2008 school year.

    It’s going to be real interesting to know how many good old boys knocked up their children in the 2008-2009 school year.

    However, to barbie, even if the number of her neighbors went to 1,000 little girls in maternity cloths, it wouldn’t make a difference unless they just happen to be Mormon’s.

    3. Bill on December 17th, 2009 at 9:54 am

  4. The best news that I’ve heard this morning is that barbie allowed the J. Edgar Homo dude to testify.

    On Appeal, the FLDS is going to claim that barbie put up witnesses for the sole purpose of inflaming the Jury.

    At this rate, the FLDS won’t have to write it down, the Appeals Court will know it all by themselves.

    Keep up the good work barbie, you’re the reason the FLDS didn’t want a change of venue and you sure are making their point. :))

    4. Bill on December 17th, 2009 at 9:44 am

  5. On May 30, 2008, just following the Supreme Court decision favoring the FLDS, former FLDS member Carolyn Jessop was quoted by CBS as warning, “They are going to move in to Texas. All the taxpayers better open their wallets and get ready to pay for it, because these people do welfare.”
    ———
    She is good for the Texas state prosecuters eh?? Did Texas authorities prove that NONE of the them were on welfare? But I guess carolyn’s lies don’t mean a thing! She is a stand up American citizen!!!!!!

    5. Dormette on December 17th, 2009 at 12:43 am

  6. Duane makes a good point about legal hoops that weren’t jumped through.

    Consider the case against Keith Dutson Jr. Keith and his wife were spiritually married by Warren Jeffs. Keith only had one wife. Keith could have legally married his wife if he had obtained a judge’s permission and a marriage license. I don’t think that he should have been charged with sexual assault of a child because his case isn’t about a much older man taking advantage of a young girl. The only thing Keith did was wrong was not follow the established protocol for getting married.

    6. cupcake on December 16th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

  7. “FBI Special Agent Rick Fagan also testified. He confirmed that FLDS prophet Warren Jeffs was on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitive’s List.” - http://www.myeldorado.net/Pages/Keate%20Trial%20Notes.html

    What does this have to do with Keates?

    What makes Carolyn and Rebecca Musser’s personal unproven experiences have to do with Keates?

    I will tell what……UEP!

    7. Dormette on December 16th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

  8. My advice for the FLDS is that if they are going to marry girls younger than the unrestricted age of consent for sex yet old enough to marry legally which in the case of Texas is 16, as 17 is the unrestricted age, then they should marry them legally with a state marriage license. If they plan to take a wife in the future, then legally divest themselves of any current “legal” marriage. To be on the safe side, one they should legally “divorce” their “legal” wife as soon as is it is practible after “legally” marrying them. If in a rush, they could travel to Las Vegas, get a quickie “legal” divorce in 1 or 2 days before “legally” marrying their new celestial wife.

    Rather surreal that a certain act that would otherwise be perfectly legal and “normal” is a heinous first degree felony equivalent to murder and rape merely as a result of some legal hoops that weren’t jumped through.

    8. duaneh on December 16th, 2009 at 10:32 pm

  9. San Angelo has its own chapter of the KKK? It figures.

    9. cupcake on December 16th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

  10. Thomas,

    I know they have. The KS said Willie Jessop was lying when he said it. The KS accuse all the FLDS of lying. I have often wondered if the KS and other like-minded people won’t believe it will stop permitting underage marriage unless Warren Jeffs formally announces it from his prison cell. Even then, the KS still might refuse to believe it.

    10. cupcake on December 16th, 2009 at 9:32 pm

  11. AS DETERMINED BY WHOM? THE GOOD OLD BOYS?

    11. Bill on December 16th, 2009 at 9:23 pm

  12. Cupcake have twiced plegded not to again marry anybody under 18. To the hatemongers, this has not made a bit of difference.

    12. THOMAS on December 16th, 2009 at 9:14 pm

  13. My advice to the FLDS is not to have sex with anyone under the age of consent.

    The KS and other like-minded people call the FLDS “pedophiles” because the girls were under the age of consent. As long as a person does not have sex with a person under the age of consent, no one can accuse that person of being a pedophile or charge that person with sexual assault of a child.

    13. cupcake on December 16th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

  14. If Common Law marriages are legal, this would not work.

    14. THOMAS on December 16th, 2009 at 8:49 pm

  15. My advice would be to “Legally” marry no one. First of all, they don’t need anybody’s permission to have a “Joining” and if they were single men, they would have the legal right to marry any girl that they chose to, thereby eliminating the legal impediment that is sending them to jail today.

    Let’s face it, if Texas then made a law that it was illegal to have more than one girl-friend, the place would be a ghost town almost overnight. (Which is not all that bad of an idea).

    15. Bill on December 16th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

  16. Hmmm. Let’s see, Tiger Woods has 13 or
    14 serial “marriages” but since he didn’t
    call them that, and isn’t taking care of the
    13 or 14 women, he has no legal problems.

    A religious FLDS man has 13 or 14 marriages
    and takes care of the women, and he’s in
    trouble because they are called marriages.

    Welcome to the new Dark Ages. Welcome
    to the New Inquisition.

    Perhaps, it’s time for the FLDS to update
    their practices. Don’t call the various
    relationships marriages.

    16. Bob on December 16th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*