headermask image

header image

CPS KILLS KID IN FOSTER CARE, TWO YEARS LATER ALLOWS MOM TO VISIT SURVIVING DAUGHTER.

Two years after CPS and CASA allowed foster parents  to beat and starve her little girl to death, CPS is just now allowing the mother to visit her remaining daughter who survived the “Care” that CPS and CASA gave her “In her best interest”.

I guess this is supposed to show that CPS and CASA have a heart after all? BULLSHIT!

We all recall how long it took CPS to find Merrianne a relative to provide her with a safe home. Naomi had to jump through every hoop they could think of. Once Merrianne was placed, they monitored her more closely than Natalie minded her own boys. She couldn’t make a phone call, could not write a letter, could not received mail or packages. They even monitored who visited with her.

You don’t starve a child to death overnight. Obviously, CPS and CASA dumped this kid and walked away. Why? Could it possibly be because they had no resale value? Negligence killed the little girl. Did any CPS or CASA caseworker get fired? Reprimanded? Jailed?

And the most important question of all; how many of these pieces of garbage involved with these children moved onto the Ranch children to “Protect” them?

You can also bet your bottom dollar that mom was coached extensively on the in-advisablity of “Dwelling on the past” or “Not accepting full blame for her daughters being starved and beaten to death.” A normal parent would have left dead bodies from one CPS office to another and then moved on to pay CASA a visit. This mother is either still on drugs or heavily coached by the Courts. Her own daughter was starved and beaten to death, and she “Thanks” her child’s murderers. No wonder CPS and CASA think they have license to kill.

GONZALES - The 2007 starvation death of 8-year-old Crystal Ramirez might breathe life into the relationship between her sister and mother.

A judge granted Crystal’s birth mother, Teresa Camarillo, in-home visitation rights with Crystal’s older sister, who also suffered starvation and torture in the hands of other guardians.

When Crystal died, her sister was 10 and her brother was 7.

Six years earlier, Camarillo’s drug use forced Child Protective Services to remove the two girls and their younger brother from their biological mother’s home. The children’s aunt and uncle, Steve and Bettie Ramirez, then adopted the children. The Ramirezes, however, were found guilty of murdering Crystal and were sentenced in February to life in prison.

Since, the children lived with an adoptive couple who live near San Antonio.

On Nov. 16, Judge Karin Bonicoro approved an agreement that allows Camarillo to host Crystal’s older sister on a limited basis.

“It’s a very big step,” Camarillo, seated on the steps of the Gonzales County Courthouse, said. “I never thought I was going to get this far. I thought that nobody was going to hear me and realize I wasn’t that same person anymore. It’s another step.”

The judge ordered background checks on anyone inside Camarillo’s home during the visits.

“I don’t want you to get any false hopes,” the judge told Camarillo, noting the visits are once a month for a few hours and not overnight stays.

The children’s San Antonio-area adoptive couple approved the biological mother’s visitation, as did Child Protective Services.

Mary Walker, a protective services spokeswoman, said it’s unusual for adoptive parents to allow birth parents visits with children.

“Once parental rights are terminated, Child Protective Services does not usually revisit the situation,” Walker said. “Terminations are final orders from the court and CPS considers it a permanent order mandating that the biological parent or parents are no longer the child’s legal parents - thus freeing them for adoption.”

Camarillo knows she owes the adoptive parents a debt of gratitude.

“That they are allowing me to bring her home for a little while. I really do appreciate it. They didn’t have to do it,” said Camarillo.

After court, Camarillo and her daughter joined other family members in a meeting room outside the courtroom. The 12-year-old girl beamed as her biological family crowded around her.

Camarillo, camera in hand, also smiled broadly.

“She’s excited that she’s going to come home for a little while. I think it’s a little overwhelming for her right now,” said Camarillo. “She didn’t expect everybody to be here. But we wanted to show her what our family really is about and how we are - to give her a chance to know us like she should have from the beginning.”

The girl accepted a new bracelet and returned her mother’s hug. And many more.

“That’s as happy as I’ve seen her in two years,” said the girl’s attorney, Forrest Penney, who watched from the courthouse hallway.

Camarillo reflected on the past that led her to lose custody of her children.

“I’m not a bad mom. I just made some bad choices in my life,” she said. “Choices that you make hurt everyone around you. You’re hurting the people that love you.”

Now, however, she has a second chance with Crystal’s sister.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

14 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Sorry, but that’s still the way it is. The only difference is that they file some worthless papers that do nothing, say nothing, and change nothing.

    An example is the “Parenting classes” the Ranch mothers had to undergo.

    Would anyone but a complete fool but their children with Angie or Natalie over Barbara or Maggie?

    1. Bill on December 15th, 2009 at 10:33 am
  2. Cupcake, the state legislature placed that time limit on CPS because they were hauling kids out of their parents’ homes, slamming them into foster care, then walking away & not investigating, providing services, or doing anything else. Shocking, huh?

    2. Riki on December 15th, 2009 at 10:19 am
  3. 18 months?

    There lies the problem. It takes some alcoholics/addicts years to get clean and sober. I’m not talking about detoxing. I’m talking about staying clean and sober and becoming a productive member of society.

    Alcoholism is a disease like cancer. The disease isn’t considered to be in remission until an alcoholic has been clean and sober for 5 years.

    3. Cupcake on December 15th, 2009 at 12:03 am
  4. I believe the NCCPR blog mentioned that MIT did a study on whether it was better to remove children from their parents custody or to give them nominal services and monitoring. In general, giving them services was better (less abuse and better child social performance), if I remember it correctly. Society would better off leaving children with their parents and letting them suffer some minor amount of neglect/abuse rather than subjecting them to the major upheaval of removal and the foster care abuse. CPS defense attorneys should make the state prove that it will better for each child to enter care by a preponderance of the evidence, including studies of the effectiveness of the foster care system.

    4. JMR on December 14th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
  5. Cupcake, by statute, CPS has a maximum of 18 months to finish the case. Most end in termination because CPS dumps so many requirements on the parents that many give up (because they don’t have attorneys or anyone helping them). And it is very true that once a child is in foster care or placed for adoption, CPS will turn a blind eye to any abuse that happens, no matter what the evidence is.

    5. Riki on December 14th, 2009 at 10:21 pm
  6. Also, I misread your article. I thought the aunt and uncle were foster parents. I believe foster parents are monitored by social services.

    When I reread your article, I realized you said that the aunt and uncle had adopted the children. They starved the little girl after they adopted her. I may be wrong about this, but I don’t think social services monitors children after they have been legally adopted.

    I don’t think CPS gave this biological mother enough time to get clean and sober before they terminated her parental rights and put her children up for adoption.

    6. Cupcake on December 14th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
  7. Bill,

    My husband did not have any children when he was drinking. Although he and I were platonic friends, I would not have anything to do with him romantically until he was clean and sober for about 5 years. We were married and had children after he cleaned himself up.

    I agree with you that that CPS should tro to help chemically dependent mothers go into rehab and help raise their children until they can do it on their own instead of quickly terminating their parental rights.

    Unfortunately, I have known people who were incapable of staying clean and sober for any length of time. It really depends on how sick the chemically dependent person is.

    7. Cupcake on December 14th, 2009 at 10:02 pm
  8. Not only that, WC, but uniformed law enforcement officers were heard telling crying kids they would never see their mothers or their siblings again, so get used to it.

    And with many more such warm expressions of love & compassion, CPS, CASA, the OAG, & law enforcement still wonder why the kids hated them so much.

    8. Riki on December 14th, 2009 at 8:15 pm
  9. at the beginning of the FLDS ordeal, CPS had no intention of returning the children.

    9. THOMAS on December 14th, 2009 at 7:29 pm
  10. When asked, CPS told the FLDS moms when seperated from their kids that they would probably never see them again- instead of “I don’t know”, which was the truth. These are the kind of people that are CPS. It seems like they WANT to inflict suffering on families. I wouldn’t trust them.

    10. WC on December 14th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
  11. An addcit will proabaly not good care of her children but she will not intentinonally murder them. CPS put this little girl into the home of a killer. The addict hae her genes invested in her chidren. The foster mother does not ands so murdered her. Those childrem were off in the home of a drug adict and not in the home of a killer.

    11. THOMAS on December 14th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
  12. Because your husband was a drug addict, did they terminate his parental rights and tell him he would never get his children back?

    That’s what they told this women who still lives in Gonzalez.

    Would it have been better to get the mother into drug rehab, sober her up, and help her raise her family until she could do it on her own?

    Once they took all 3 of her children away, would it be prudent for them to check in on the kids now and then?

    Once they received ADDITIONAL reports of abuse from the children’s school that they were being abused, shouldn’t CPS and CASA have kept a real close eye on the children, especially after the foster parents removed the children from public school and nobody ever saw them again?

    When she died, she weighed 48 pounds. Did she lose that weight overnight?

    When she died, she had 10 area’s of bleeding on the brain. he and her sister were bound to patio chairs that served as their beds at night. They were bound by duck tape to the “Bed” hand and foot. Their heads were wrapped in duck tape with their mouthes taped shut. They were not allowed to drink or go to the bathroom at night.

    Is this the kind of “Vetting” CPS and CASA does to determine if a parent is fit to raise a child?

    THIS is the kind of neglect and abuse they attributed to Barbara Jessop.

    Somehow, in their mind, a “Mother” like Natalie, who has her children sleep in dog shit is more suitable to raise a child than this mother or ANY of the women on the Ranch?

    This child was murdered. CPS and CSA were the accomplishes to murder. The foster parents could NOT have done it without their full help and co-operation right down the line.

    I’m in touch with the mother, and I’ll be getting the names of these children’s CPS and CASA workers. I think they need to be congratulated for their fine work
    along with their Supervisor in Gonzalez that is married to a cop involved in this murder.

    The foster parents need to rot in hell for what they did, but they should NOT be rotting alone.

    12. Bill on December 14th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
  13. Bill,

    My husband has been clean and sober for 20 years, so my views bout this might be different from yours. Please don’t get upset at me.

    1) The biological mother was a drug addict. A woman can either be a good mother or a good drug addict, but she cannot be both.

    2) The girl who died was placed with family members and died in their care.
    Granted, CPS should have been supervising the family better. How often did a CPS worker visit the home? Did the children voice any concerns, complaints or fears? Did the children look hungry? How much food was in the relatives’ home? Was it locked up so the children couldn’t get to it?

    3) Did CPS terminate the biological mother’s parental rights before or after the girl died?

    4) How long did CPS give the biological mother to get clean and sober? Did they take into consideration that the death of a child is emotionally painful and would make it difficult for many addicts to stay clean?

    5) The biological mother claims to be clean and sober now. Getting and staying clean is an accomplishment she can be proud of. Would it have been better for the children if CPS had placed them in a temporary foster home while their biological mother got clean than putting them up for adoption?

    There are lots of unanswered questions in this case.

    13. Cupcake on December 14th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
  14. It’s a sad state of affairs when CPS has its star child-kidnapper, Charles Childress, go out & make presentations during which he expresses no remorse about making sure all family ties are severed & that he doesn’t really give a damn if the kids he “liberates” have ANY family ties (biological or adopted) once they reach 18. He doesn’t care if the CPS case workers pick up the kids on their 18th birthdays & dump them at homeless shelters. He doesn’t see why kids would need to have their Constitutional rights respected, such as worshiping in a church of their choice, & hates it when kids thrown in CPS jail get a copy of the Foster Child’s Bill of Rights (because then they start getting all uppity & wanting to go to their own church, their own school, see their own friends, etc). How this rat b#st#rd sleeps at night is beyond me.

    14. Riki on December 14th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*