WHO’S LISA TANNER AND HOW DOES SHE KNOW PHILIP KEMP?

I love Texas politics, it’s like going on a hunt with Dick Cheney; you have to be drunk, stupid and clueless.

One of the stand-ins for Abbott to persecute the Mormons is Lisa Tanner. Her name rang no bells with me, so I did a little digging. Turns out that she’s up to her tits in bed with Philip Kemp trying to keep his Mineola Sex Club fantasy alive and well. Obviously, she’s well aware of his penchant for making up juisy stories about little children having sex, “loosing” exculpatory evidence during Trials, and spending close to two years “Investigating” hoax telephone calls from Rozita with no conclusions or filing of charges.

Why would Lisa and Philly be a tag team?

“All of this was enough for Bingham. According to Tyler defense attorney Bobby Mims, on Thursday, July 30, Bingham told trial judge Jack Skeen that he was going to recuse his office from the case because of the possible violations of the prosecution’s obligation to turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defense. (The planned recusal was reported that evening on Tyler’s CBS affiliate, KYTX.) Bingham also asked the AG’s office to step in and take over the still-pending Pittman case. But on July 31 Lisa Tanner, assistant attorney general, refused. She did this in a group telephone conversation and, according to Mims, who was a part of the group (he has become, in his words, “something of a spokesperson for the defense bar in Smith County”), she said she was worried about her office’s workload and the ability of the attorneys to do a thorough job before a fall trial date. But Tanner told Bingham the AG would assist in his prosecution, and so later on July 31 he asked Skeen for a continuance in the Pittman trial. Skeen agreed to it, and now the AG is sending two investigators to Tyler.” “Sex, Lies and Videotapes, Texas Monthly.”

Lisa baby KNOWS Philip can’t tell the truth on the stand if he swore on a Bible, and she also KNOWS that whatever the AG wants a Texas Ranger to say on the stand, HE WILL.

Once Johnnie Hanna takes that banana out of his pocket, will he tell the truth on the stand?

That really depends: If he is asked if the Bishops Records were stolen before or after the Order came from Barbie, then No, he will lie.

If he is asked if he ever allowed the “Evidence” to leave his custody and control without a Court Order, then no, he will lie.

If he is asked if he ever produced the “Evidence” of un-redacted pictures of children supposedly involved in sex acts, then no, he will lie.

Now, will Lisa, who KNOWS his answers, and Philips answers, to be perjury on the witness stand stand up and object? You didn’t see her stand up and object during the Mineola case when Kemp committed one Perjured statement after the other did you?

Once again, what we have is “The end justify’s the means” persecution going on in barbie’s “Court”, and even while Lisa KNOWS that the “Evidence” was illegally siezed prior to a Court Order, she will use it hoping that the entire case isn’t overturned by the COA, or the lies uncovered by some fool submitting the wrong paperwork to the defense.

However, just as she KNOWS that the Mineola case was flushed down the toilet by Kemp, Hanna is doing the same exact thing to her in the YFZ case. No wonder Abbott is sending her to do his dirty work. Better to make her and Engels look stupid than doing it himself.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds